
Mineral wealth is only a strategic asset if the state controls the terms.
Read moreMineral wealth is only a strategic asset if a state controls the terms on which it is extracted, processed, and sold. Concession structures, opaque ownership, foreign influence, and global competition for critical minerals increasingly determine where value is created and who ultimately benefits from a nation’s resources.

In detail
Critical minerals sit at the center of economic security, the energy transition, advanced manufacturing, and defense industries. At the same time, governments must make strategic decisions about domestic value addition, supply chain resilience, and geopolitical alignment, while managing broader resource systems such as water, food production, fisheries, and forests. Across all of these sectors, sovereignty depends as much on governance and stakeholder dynamics as on the resources themselves.
Mineral wealth is only a strategic asset if the state controls the terms.
The LFA premise
We work with governments and development partners to strengthen sovereign control over critical minerals and strategic resources. Our work supports concession analysis, critical minerals strategies, domestic value-addition initiatives, strategic resource governance, and the development of resilient supply chains aligned with national priorities.

In detail
Using AI-supported data collection, we identify the relationships, incentives, and influence networks that shape resource governance, investment decisions, and strategic partnerships. We help clients understand where foreign influence, opaque ownership structures, and competing commercial interests may affect long-term national control.
In practice
Our work extends beyond mining to the wider strategic-resource base, including water, transboundary river basins, arable land, fisheries, and forests. By helping clients to understand the human factor behind resource governance, we also increase understanding of the interests surrounding concessions, agreements, and investments. This results in clearer insights into sovereign risk, a stronger negotiating position, and strategies that maximize long-term national value, rather than short-term extraction.